MDN/Archives/Projects/Content/Learning Area/Weekly meetings/2015-10-19

From MozillaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Agenda/Notes

The Learning Area weekly meeting takes place in the #mdn channel on irc.mozilla.org at 10 AM PDT (17:00 UTC, 19:00 CEST). See the meeting time in your time zone. It's open to anyone that would like to participate, so please feel free to join in!

Actions

New

Continue

On hold

Agenda

Content

Planning

Other topics

  • (dvincent) Twitter review and storytelling
  • (Jeremie) I'll be off next week, we need someone to run the meeting

Meeting minutes

  • (19:00) Jeremie: This is the fifty-nineth weekly meeting about the Learning Area :)
  • (19:00) Jeremie: Agenda is there: https://wiki.mozilla.org/MDN/Projects/Content/Learning_Area/Weekly_meetings/2015-10-19
  • (19:00) Jeremie: Feel free to add anything you want to discuss.
  • (19:00) Jeremie: And as usual: who's attending? :D
  • (19:00) andrew: o/
  • (19:01) dvincent: o/
  • (19:01) chadsansing: o/
  • (19:02) Jeremie: Hi :) Glad to see you all :)
  • (19:02) andrew: Hi Jeremie :)
  • (19:02) chadsansing: Hello :)
  • (19:03) Jeremie: Ok, let's get started

follow up on action item.

  • (19:04) Jeremie: First and only item is on me, it's about the HTML cheatsheet
  • (19:04) dvincent: and me!
  • (19:04) Jeremie: After some discussion with dvincent I make a stub
  • (19:04) dvincent: sorry, I did not do it
  • (19:04) dvincent: yay
  • (19:05) dvincent: thank you!
  • (19:05) Jeremie: dvincent: No worries, you swamped into the code source event ;)
  • (19:05) Jeremie: So here it is: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Learn/HTML/Cheatsheet
  • (19:05) dvincent: awesome, thank you!
  • (19:05) chadsansing: Cool -
  • (19:06) Jeremie: chadsansing: I realized that I do not have your e-mail so I'm glad you're here :)
  • (19:06) chadsansing: Heh. Chad at mofo.
  • (19:07) Jeremie: So it's just a stub so feel free to add stuff to it, I only provide examples but it's very open, event the look and feel or the organization if you think better things can be done, just do it :)
  • (19:07) Jeremie: chadsansing: Ah, I should have known :P
  • (19:07) sheppy: :)
  • (19:08) Jeremie: dvincent: Feel free to spread the word :)
  • (19:08) dvincent: yes indeed!!
  • (19:09) Jeremie: The only "requirement" we should put on that cheatsheet is: "Keep it simple" ;)
  • (19:09) Jeremie: Even if big :)
  • (19:09) dvincent: absolutely. It's a "cheat sheet." Oh, should I make links out to the other pages with more information?
  • (19:10) Jeremie: dvincent: I think that this one is good enough so far
  • (19:10) dvincent: if available?
  • (19:10) dvincent: ok
  • (19:10) Jeremie: Any question or suggestion before moving forward?
  • (19:11) andrew: I'm glad to see the note about how HTML is only for semantics, but you don't think "formatting" is too visual a term?
  • (19:11) Jeremie: andrew: Man, who do you think I'm ? ;) However, feel free to rephrase my poor English :P
  • (19:12) andrew: Yes, I'm a little uncomfortable, but I can't think of a better word offhand =)
  • (19:13) Jeremie: FWIT, many people better react to visual words, especially beginner that don't really know of other form of web accessibility at the beginning. However I haven't strong opinion in that area :)
  • (19:14) Jeremie: For me aslong as it's understandable and not to much nit picking that will work.
  • (19:15) andrew: Theoretically, I prefer "block-level element" and "inline element", but I can't speak for other people.
  • (19:15) dvincent: "formatting" was clear to me even though it does have a visual association.
  • (19:16) dvincent: I think as long as it's clearly understandable, the semantics of visual vs. structural is less important.
  • (19:16) dvincent: just my $0.08
  • (19:16) Jeremie: andrew: That is really technical and among things I could consider nit picking ;) But as I said the organisation of the page is far from set in stone, and can be adjust as needed :)
  • (19:17) andrew: Well, it's just a cheatsheet =)
  • (19:17) Jeremie: indeed :)
  • (19:17) chadsansing: I think "element" could work if we add a short paragraph above the Inline & Block sections explaining how they differ. Gives us an excuse to define "element," as well.
  • (19:17) Jeremie: chadsansing: Go for it :) It's a stub, it awaits for content and structure :)
  • (19:18) chadsansing: Will give it a go shortly.
  • (19:18) Jeremie: \o/

Progress about Learning CSS

  • (19:19) Jeremie: I would sumarized as: So far So good
  • (19:19) Jeremie: The theory goes well
  • (19:19) Jeremie: Big thanks to heather who did the editorial reviews :)
  • (19:20) Jeremie: WIP status is available on Trello as usual: https://trello.com/c/NAuDmn9u
  • (19:21) Jeremie: I expect to tackle to more article. I'm currently doing the one about CSS Syntax
  • (19:21) Jeremie: It's basically about refreshing some existing content
  • (19:21) Jeremie: Feel free to ping me if you want to get involved ;)
  • (19:21) Jeremie: Any question about this?

Trello board review

  • (19:23) Jeremie: https://trello.com/b/LDggrYSV
  • (19:23) Jeremie: What's up with your cards?
  • (19:23) Jeremie: Any status to report or help to ask?
  • (19:25) andrew: I don't have much time, but over the next couple weeks I'm going to finish my HTML table article and jump into CSS.
  • (19:25) Jeremie: andrew: \o/
  • (19:26) andrew: Snails go faster than rocks :)
  • (19:26) Jeremie: That's just great :) Thanks to andrew we have a very solid HTML content :D
  • (19:26) dvincent: "Snails go faster than rocks." - Andrew. I'm going to use that quote. :)
  • (19:26) andrew: Thank you, Jeremie, I'm glad when I can help!
  • (19:27) Jeremie: andrew: Yes, and rushing doesn't bring anything good
  • (19:27) andrew: dvincent: :)
  • (19:28) Jeremie: dvincent: BTW, andrew finished the https://trello.com/c/5h7cBli3/52-article-how-to-add-a-hit-map-on-top-of-an-image articles, asking for reviews would be great :)
  • (19:28) dvincent: you got it!
  • (19:30) Jeremie: klez: Any news or plan about Python?
  • (19:30) klez: nope :(
  • (19:31) Jeremie: klez: Ok, no problem :)
  • (19:31) klez: I just shuffled a little of stuff around in the glossary, but didn't have time to do much more
  • (19:31) Jeremie: Okay

Twitter review and storytelling

  • (19:32) dvincent: I have nothing to report. :(
  • (19:33) dvincent: sorry, been heads-down on View Source
  • (19:33) Jeremie: dvincent: No problem :) Just checking :)
  • (19:34) Jeremie: Beyond what have been said in the meeting is there any things that worth twitting any of you wish to highlight?
  • (19:35) Jeremie: Ok, I guess it's a no :)

Next week meeting

  • (19:36) Jeremie: I won't be able to run next week meeting
  • (19:37) Jeremie: I'll be swamp into on of my client project so I need some one to take charge of running the show
  • (19:37) Jeremie: Don't be shy as all the stuff that needs to be done are documented here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/MDN/Projects/Content/Learning_Area/Weekly_meetings#How_to_run_a_meeting
  • (19:38) andrew: All right, I can do that. Even if there's not be terribly much to discuss ;)
  • (19:38) dvincent: Is this one of those situations where we get to nominate someone who isn't here? :)
  • (19:38) dvincent: yay andrew!
  • (19:38) Jeremie: andrew: \o/
  • (19:38) andrew: dvincent: Maybe your idea's even better ;)
  • (19:39) Jeremie: But yes, as far as project goes smooth, the meeting should be short :)
  • (19:40) andrew: Good, we'll be friendly but business-like. Will we see you there, Jeremie?
  • (19:40) Jeremie: I don't think so, I should be almost invisible an unreachable the whole week :-/
  • (19:41) andrew: Hope your project prospers!
  • (19:41) Jeremie: andrew: They are ;)
  • (19:41) Jeremie: Ok, with andrew taking charge of the meeting next week we are running out of topics? Any last one or question before we end the meeting?