Thunderbird:Thunderbird3:ContentSecReview/Cookies Security Review
From MozillaWiki
Contents
Overview
Lift the Thunderbird 2 restriction on cookies so that they are usable by content mainly for the purposes of extensions investigating linking to web sies / applications and new ideas.
- Background links
Security and Privacy
- Is this feature a security feature? If it is, what security issues is it intended to resolve?
- Yes.
- Cookies were too limited:
- Just loading content for RSS feeds or background loading of RSS feeds
- Cookie preferences were ignored.
- Now:
- Cookies can be accessed in content according to the same cookie policy as Firefox with extra restrictions.
- Extra restrictions: cookies on these protocols are denied: imap, news, snews, mailbox
- What potential security issues in your feature have you already considered and addressed?
- Cookie privacy - users have access to the same preferences as Firefox to allow/deny cookies as appropriate. This will apply to all content loaded unless denied by the policy.
- Protocols - the mail protocols have cookies denied on them.
- Remote content in emails - see below.
- Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing?
- The code has the same default preference values as the preference file.
- Include a thorough description of the security assumptions, capabilities and any potential risks (possible attack points) being introduced by your project.
- From bug 501925 comment 7:
The one slightly odd case that I can think of is this: * a web site shown by the RSS code or by an extension sets a cookie * the user subsequently receives an email which they agree to trust remote content from (or is from a sender whom they've previously agreed to trust all messages from). * remote content in the email will send the cookie from the previous browsing session back to the server, allowing correlation previously unavailable between web pages.
-
How are transitions in/out of Private Browsing mode handled?
Exported APIs
- Please provide a table of exported interfaces (APIs, ABIs, protocols, UI, etc.)
- No new ones over existing gecko interfaces
- Does it interoperate with a web service? How will it do so?
- N/A
- Explain the significant file formats, names, syntax, and semantics.
- N/A
- Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully?
- N/A
- Does it change any existing interfaces?
- N/A
Module interactions
- What other modules are used (REQUIRES in the makefile, interfaces)?
- N/A
Data
- What data is read or parsed by this feature?
- What is the output of this feature?
- What storage formats are used?
Reliability
- What failure modes or decision points are presented to the user?
- Can its files be corrupted by failures? Does it clean up any locks/files after crashes?
Configuration
- Can the end user configure settings, via a UI or about:config? Hidden prefs? Environment variables?
- UI:
- Manage Cookies
- Add Exceptions
- network.cookie.cookieBehavior, network.cookie.lifetimePolicy, network.cookie.blockFutureCookies
- UI:
- Are there build options for developers? [#ifdefs, ac_add_options, etc.]
- None
- What ranges for the tunable are appropriate? How are they determined?
- Same as gecko.
- What are its on-going maintenance requirements (e.g. Web links, perishable data files)?
- Same as gecko.
Relationships to other projects
Are there related projects in the community?
Not applicable
- If so, what is the proposal's relationship to their work? Do you depend on others' work, or vice-versa?
- Are you updating, copying or changing functional areas maintained by other groups? How are you coordinating and communicating with them? Do they "approve" of what you propose?