Firefox/Aurora/2011-08-30
From MozillaWiki
Giving QA a heads up
- Matt was talking about a previous proposal to somehow surface stuff in a release that QA needs to test
- smooney gave some background as not everyone was aware of the proposal
- This proposal/conversation was not widely distributed
- Discussion about if status and tracking flags handle this already
- Generally qawanted, regression, and tracking should be what QA needs to look at
- Project pages should help with features as there will be more defined up front
- Had a discussion about how 1000 bugs are too much for QA to go through
- johnath suggested it's better to start at 1000 bugs and whittle down than PM to have their features and figure out if there is more
- juan said he can look at a changelog and prioritize but contractors and newer people can't do that as much
- asa pointed out developers often underestimate potential risks (he had a disclaimer saying how much he loves developers)
- Another problem was surfaced that we do not use the current flags the same way on Desktop and Mobile.
- Next actions
- Juan is going to post about better use of qa-wanted flag
- Christian to follow-up with a post about the use of the flags
- Asa to work with Anthony and QA to review the list of changes which are not obviously part of feature pages and try and isolate/prioritize those that need attention
Growing Aurora audience
- Grace gave a presentation/update about what product marketing is doing to grow the aurora audience
- Link to Developer Events: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/events
- Link to Contributor Events: https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReMo/Events_Calendar